Well JM, go on and believe your own patronizing crap about saturation of Natal airport.
Next time you are there visit the toilets, since you seem to have the knowledge to asses sewage and toilets capacity, and you will notice that there not queuing to get in there.
But now I am going to give other different example showing the fragility of the tourist demand for Brazil.
In December 2006 the Spanish company AIR MADRID collapsed and had to file for bankruptcy.
Before that they were flying Madrid – Fortaleza twice a week (about 250 seats each flight)
After the stopped, ultimo December 2006, nobody has bothered to take up this flight and their respective slots. There is not a flight MAD – FOR today
Then using common sense most discerning travelers and investors will get to the conclusion that there are not as much demand for Brazil as real estate agents pretend.
By the way, in Natal this season already started weaker than last year’s, regarding overseas tourists.
1) The only reason I was patronizing in my post was because of your patronizing original post which claimed only stupid people would believe the hype that Natal airport was working at more than 25% capacity based on no facts or figures or any other relevant assessment - if you know that it is working at 25% capacity and not 110% capacity as the management company, newspapers and politicians say, then please share it with us, we'd love to be enlightened.
2) You are right, there are no direct flights from Madrid to Fortaleza. There are also no direct flights from Madrid to Natal or Madrid to Salvador that I know of. There are numerous pages of options and different prices for flights from Madrid to either one of the above but with a minimum of 1 "hop" or a maximum of 2 "hops" - either going through Lisbon with TAP or through the Cape Verde with TACV. I found 6 pages of flight options to get from Madrid to Fortaleza.
But that has no relevance to whether the airport in Natal is at capacity or not and therefore while it is interesting and could possibly be used to discuss an entirely different subject, it does nothing to justify your earlier comment about the airport capacity. So by the fact that you are changing subjects - can we assume that your comment about the airport working at 25% was plucked out of the sky or did you actually look into the matter and can come back with a productive discussion on the topic?
Regarding the fact that this tourist season is weaker than last years - (and I'm asking because I honestly don't have a clue if it's weaker or stronger) - that's very sad to hear...
How do you know? What are you basing that on? Do you have any data or sources which we could have access to by which to compare to last year? Are there less tourists or just less revenue per capita?
I see that you agree with him GW. Maybe you'd be as kind as to share where you are getting that information from and what comparisons you are using to reach that conclusion.
I'm afraid my sources only produce their reports for January about half way into February so I'll only be able to compare statistics in a week or so.